![]() O’Connor had an expired passport and driver’s license, which are not acceptable forms of identification to vote under state law. The newest plaintiff is John O’Connor, a 90-year-old Columbia, Missouri, resident with poor vision who needs help walking. Trust What we think about trust and politics is (mostly) wrong Arguments against the law Beetem again to find the voter ID requirement unconstitutional. The Missouri ACLU and Missouri Voter Protection Coalition, who sued on behalf of the plaintiffs, have since added another voter to the lawsuit and asked Mr. He found neither of the two voters “alleged a specific, concrete, non-speculative injury or legally protectable interest in challenging the photo ID requirement.” The Missouri League of Women Voters, NAACP, and two voters sued to overturn the law last year, arguing the change makes casting ballots unconstitutionally difficult for some voters.Ĭole County Presiding Judge Jon Beetem, who also will hear arguments in the trial beginning Friday, dismissed the case in October 2022. The law requires the state to provide a free photo identification card to those lacking one to vote. ![]() People without a government-issued photo ID can cast provisional ballots to be counted if they return later that day with a photo ID or if election officials verify their signatures. Missouri’s GOP-led Legislature last year capped off a nearly two-decade-long push by Republicans and passed a law requiring voters to show photo identification to cast a regular ballot. Here is a look at the function of the law and why voting rights groups are suing: What the law does A trial for a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Missouri’s new photo identification requirement for voters is scheduled to begin on Nov.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |